Big Bang model of the Universe – Either “big explosion” or “big expansion”?

“Big Bang Model of the Universe”

Either “big explosion” or “big expansion”?

(An Implication of the “Theory of Grand Settlement” – As Reproduced from “The Second Religion”)

*****

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B088SXS99M/ 

             https://www.amazon.in/dp/B088SXS99M/

https://thesecondreligion.wordpress.com/

*****

Author: SELVAGANESAN RAMAIAH

Copyright © Selvaganesan Ramaiah 2020 / ROC (INDIA) No. L-92078 / 2020

****

In the Big Bang Model of the Universe, was it a big explosion or a big expansion?

This is neither an explosion of nor an expansion from, an incredibly hot and dense primordial atom.

It was a smooth start from an (if not many) infinitesimally small speck of energy that emanated into the absolute empty space, infinitely long back in time.

A newly hypothesised theory called, the “Theory of Grand Settlement” says,

  1. Originally there was nothing; which means there was not even vacuum energy present in the space. We may call this the “Absolute Empty Space”.
  2. This Absolute Empty Space, though a Big Nothing, is infinite in its spatial extents with an infinite rate of time flow everywhere. Yes, this Absolute Empty Space is both zero and infinity, the non-reachable entities to the human intellect. The human intellect can dwell only in a finite and discrete domain, made up of energy, space and time.
  3. Hypothetically speaking, if we introduce an energy component, say a massless photon into this Absolute Empty Space, it will be present everywhere simultaneously, realizing an infinite rate of time flow everywhere. And, thereby the absolute empty space becomes a point. That means, when one views from this Universe, the absolute empty space would look like a point and when he dives into it, the same would become an infinite void (infinitely nothing?).
  4. With respect to our (today’s) local rate of time flow, it was infinitely long back that there were perturbations in the absolute empty space, leading to minuscule fluctuations of energy. If not many, there must have at least been one perturbation to start with. This energy component, which rose from nothing, was the first candidate for the creation of a new entity called “Energy-Space-Time ”, which was altogether a different phenomenon from the pre-existing Absolute Empty Space. This new minuscule Energy gave rise to a minuscule Space making a minuscule dent in the rate of Time flow, which was hitherto infinite in the Absolute Empty Space. The word, “Energy” hence simply means “Energy-Space-Time” hereafter.
  5. This fluctuated (created) energy component didn’t have a pre-existing anti-energy component and so it couldn’t get annihilated immediately after its appearance.
  6. To maintain the conservation of energy, immediately after the appearance of the first energy component, anti-energy components appeared in kind, not one, but innumerably many, phase-shifted. These phase-shifted components emanated away from the point of fluctuations towards all directions. When added up, these anti-energy (phase-shifted) components would strictly be a single anti-energy (180 degrees phase-shifted) component of the first one.
  7. Interestingly and most favourably, these innumerable phase-shifted reactive energy components didn’t appear simultaneously due to the Principle of Non-Simultaneity of Events. They all appeared with minuscule time differences with independent reference frames.
  8. Such individual energy components were responsible for the creation of a host of further phase-shifted energy components.
  9. This energy-creation cycle went on exponentially forever and it continues even today.

Moreover, how an exponential function of space expansion/creation had a definite beginning, like the Big Bang?

Isn’t it true that “e^x” can hit the x-axis (timeline) only at negative infinity?

Why can’t the observations of JWST be right?

To have a grown-up galaxy even before 13.8 billion years must have been possible!

Yes, the “Theory of Grand Settlement” is proven right!

[ For the full article

https://www.academia.edu/50260879/Theory_of_Grand_Settlement_A_new_Theory_of_Everything ]

— Selvaganesan Ramaiah

****

Leave a comment